item3
Topical Studies
BXP56752h

HOME / BIBLE STUDIES / TOPICAL STUDIES / SHUT DOOR TEACHINGS PROVE SDA PROPHET FALSE

Shut Door Teachings Prove SDA Prophet False

DAVID W. DEPINHO 
  

Since sharing my initial testimony about leaving the ministry of the Seventh-day Adventist (SDA) Church, I have continued my study of the Shut Door doctrine of early Adventism and have new information to pass on. As was stated in my aforementioned testimony, I left Adventism because I discovered essential problems with the place and ministry of Ellen G. White (SDA Prophet) in Seventh-day Adventism. That led me to reevaluate and ultimately reach different conclusions about other SDA doctrines. I share my testimony in this article as a witness to these discoveries.

I believed at the writing of my initial testimony and still believe today that many Seventh-day Adventists are converted, grace-based Christians who simply may be confused about certain issues. The burden of my testimony and this article is not to argue that Adventists are not converted or that they are legalists (legalists are present in many denominations), but that Adventism as a system is based on certain false teachings about Ellen White that lead to certain flaws in doctrine resulting in inevitable confusion. So this article is by definition strictly defined and targeted to one issue, that of the reliability and trustworthiness of Mrs. Ellen G. White.

After posting my testimony I have been overwhelmed to learn I am not the only SDA minister to come to conclusions similar to mine. In fact, eight other SDA ministers have contacted me and told me that they had learned what I had learned, but they had learned it years before me. The interesting thing is that these men have not left Adventism. Most said that the only reason they had not left their post as SDA pastors, educators or chaplains is that they were comfortable with the people (friends) and wanted to keep their jobs; they did not know what they would do if they lost their income.

There were other reasons for not leaving the Adventist ministry, too. One pastor told me that he was agitating for change in the system. I can respect that, and I think it is a laudable motive. However, I think the Adventists have a point when they preach that there is a time to come out of Babylon. Adventism, with its adherence and acceptance of Ellen G. White, represents confusion at its best. Honest people have to make a decision at some point to withdraw their support of a church system that teaches outright error of such significance, no matter what the cost.

In this update, I would like clarify some of my conclusions from my initial testimony and give a little more history. To that end, let me begin.

As a former Seventh-day Adventist pastor my story begins at the Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary in Berrien Springs, Michigan, during my work on my Master of Divinity degree. I was taking a class called "Biblical Hermeneutics" from Dr. Gerhard Hasel. Dr. Hasel was a great professor with a sharp wit that his students enjoyed. His classes were top notch, and his students learned a great deal from him. We even teased him a bit over the difficulty and rigors of his class. Once we put a sign on the classroom door that read, "Hasel's House of Hermeneutical Horrors". But his class was worth it. He taught us how to carefully and honestly "interpret" scripture and other writings, which is what "hermeneutics" means, the science of how to interpret.

It was during that class that I happened upon a passage in Ellen White's book Early Writings. I found, on my own, a "Shut Door" reference that was difficult to understand. No one led me to it to criticize Ellen White. Since it was 1990, the internet was still mostly in the future. The passage just happened to be part of my reading. The passage is long, but the context is worth our time to gain clarity. We will look at it in a moment. I brought the passage to the attention of Dr. Hasel, for his insight. At the time I was not particularly upset by the passage. I trusted that there would be a perfectly acceptable answer to what she had written. I believed, at the time, that it would be ok and understandable for a prophet to misunderstand what God has communicated to her. But Dr. Hasel's response surprised me. I expected him to give me insights and perhaps a complete explanation for the reference that would make perfect sense. But instead, he did the unexpected. He stonewalled me.

He denied that Ellen White ever made the Shut Door statement. I had the book with me as we spoke; I lifted it to show him the passage. He would not look at it; he said he did not need to see it and that Ellen White had never written such a thing. I lowered the book as I looked at him, bewildered. I could see that he was not going to engage with me on the topic any further; the conversation was over. Those who knew Dr. Hasel knew he was a man with a powerful personality, and the conversation really was over.

There are a number of possibilities to that strange interchange. I will let you draw your own conclusion, or no conclusion at all. As I consider it, I believe one possible conclusion is that since Dr. Hasel had just been through the Walter Rea controversy over Ellen White in the early eighties and was tired of the topic. He knew what he thought on the subject and was just tired of talking about what he considered an old issue.

If I am right, I know I have seen this attitude a hundred times since then: the refusal of people to revisit something about which they have already made up their minds. I hope that is not the case with you, the reader. I pray that you will be willing to slow down and really consider the evidence I am about to put forward.

The leaders of the Ellen White Estate have put forth a plausible answer to the Ellen White's Shut Door comments, but its plausible only if you don't look too closely. But for those willing to look carefully, there is an unmistakable key that exposes Ellen White as a fraud even if an honestly self-deluded or just forgetful one. What is more, if someone does look closely at the issues and evidence surrounding the early SDA teaching of the Shut Door, they will discover the unmistakable evidence that shows EGW's statements are false and that the EGW Estate defense is either committing a terrible oversight, or worse, they are covering up.

The numbers of current SDA pastors and educators who have contacted me tell me that this evidence and the implications are not difficult to see if people will honestly look at the material that is available from the White Estate. All quotes I have used come from the White Estate web page, www.ellenwhite.com.

Now let's look at that passage with a quick review and then follow it up with a more detailed study of the wider Shut Door teaching by referencing other quotes.

Please notice the capitalized references to page 86 that the White Estate has added (not me) to lead readers to a defense of the passage added to Early Writings. Bold type is mine.

 

The Open and the Shut Door

"Sabbath, March 24, 1849, we had a sweet and very interesting meeting with the brethren at Topsham, Maine. The Holy Ghost was poured out upon us, and I was taken off in the Spirit to the city of the living God. Then I was shown that the commandments of God and the testimony of Jesus Christ relating to the shut door could not be separated, and that the time for the commandments of God to shine out with all their importance, and for God's people to be tried on the Sabbath truth, was when the door was opened in the most holy place in the heavenly sanctuary, where the ark is, in which are contained the ten commandments. This door was not opened until the mediation of Jesus was finished in the holy place of the sanctuary in 1844. Then Jesus rose up and shut the door of the holy place, and opened the door into the most holy, and passed within the second veil, where He now stands by the ark, and where the faith of Israel now reaches. {EW 42.1}"

"I saw that Jesus had shut the door of the holy place, and no man can open it; and that He had opened the door into the most holy, and no man can shut it (Rev. 3:7,8); [SEE PAGE 86. SEE ALSO APPENDIX.] and that since Jesus has opened the door into the most holy place, which contains the ark, the commandments have been shining out to God's people, and they are being tested on the Sabbath question. {EW 42.2}"

"I saw that the present test on the Sabbath could not come until the mediation of Jesus in the holy place was finished and He had passed within the second veil; therefore Christians who fell asleep before the door was opened into the most holy, when the midnight cry was (Page 43) finished, at the seventh month, 1844, and who had not kept the true Sabbath, now rest in hope; for they had not the light and the test on the Sabbath which we now have since that door was opened. I saw that Satan was tempting some of God's people on this point. Because so many good Christians have fallen asleep in the triumphs of faith and have not kept the true Sabbath, they were doubting about its being a test for us now. {EW 42.3}"

"The enemies of the present truth have been trying to open the door of the holy place, that Jesus has shut, and to close the door of the most holy place, which He opened in 1844, where the ark is, containing the two tables of stone on which are written the ten commandments by the finger of Jehovah. {EW 43.1}

"Satan is now using every device in this sealing time to keep the minds of God's people from the present truth and to cause them to waver. I saw a covering that God was drawing over His people to protect them in the time of trouble; and every soul that was decided on the truth and was pure in heart was to be covered with the covering of the Almighty. {EW 43.2}"

"Satan knew this, and he was at work in mighty power to keep the minds of as many people as he possibly could wavering and unsettled on the truth. I saw that the mysterious knocking in New York and other places was the power of Satan, and that such things would be more and more common, clothed in a religious garb so as to lull the deceived to greater security and to draw the minds of God's people, if possible, to those things and cause them to doubt the teachings and power of the Holy Ghost. [SEE PAGE 86. SEE ALSO APPENDIX.] {EW 43.3}"

"I saw that Satan was working through agents in a number of ways. He was at work through ministers who have rejected the truth and are given over to (page 44) strong delusions to believe a lie that they might be damned. While they were preaching or praying, some would fall prostrate and helpless, not by the power of the Holy Ghost, but by the power of Satan breathed upon these agents, and through them to the people. While preaching, praying, or conversing, some professed Adventists who had rejected present truth used mesmerism to gain adherents, and the people would rejoice in this influence, for they thought it was the Holy Ghost. Some even that used it were so far in the darkness and deception of the devil that they thought it was the power of God, given them to exercise. They had made God altogether such a one as themselves and had valued His power as a thing of nought. {EW 43.4}"

"Some of these agents of Satan were affecting the bodies of some of the saints--those whom they could not deceive and draw away from the truth by a Satanic influence. Oh, that all could get a view of it as God revealed it to me, that they might know more of the wiles of Satan and be on their guard! I saw that Satan was at work in these ways to distract, deceive, and draw away

"God's people, just now in this sealing time. I saw some who were not standing stiffly for present truth. Their knees were trembling, and their feet sliding, because they were not firmly planted on the truth, and the covering of Almighty God could not be drawn over them while they were thus trembling. {EW 44.1}"

"Satan was trying his every art to hold them where they were, until the sealing was past, until the covering was drawn over God's people, and they left without a shelter from the burning wrath of God, in the seven last plagues. God has begun to draw this covering over His people, and it will soon be drawn over all who are to have a shelter in the day of slaughter. God will work in power for His people; and Satan will be permitted to work also. (Page 45) {EW 44.2}"

"I saw that the mysterious signs and wonders and false reformations would increase and spread. The reformations that were shown me were not reformations from error to truth. My accompanying angel bade me look for the travail of soul for sinners as used to be. I looked, but could not see it; for the time for their salvation is past."

In the last sentence of this passage the White Estate would have us believe that EGW was talking about other churches loosing their burden for lost souls rather then EGW speaking of her own conclusions about the burden of Adventists for the lost. Please read the White Estate note added and the EGW quotes used to mislead the reader on this point.

"THE WRITER OF THESE WORDS DID NOT UNDERSTAND THEM AS TEACHING THAT THE TIME FOR THE SALVATION OF ALL SINNERS WAS PAST. AT THE VERY TIME WHEN THESE THINGS WERE WRITTEN SHE HERSELF WAS LABORING FOR THE SALVATION OF SINNERS, AS SHE HAS BEEN DOING EVER SINCE.

"HER UNDERSTANDING OF THE MATTER AS IT HAS BEEN PRESENTED TO HER IS GIVEN IN THE FOLLOWING PARAGRAPHS, THE FIRST PUBLISHED IN 1854, AND THE SECOND IN 1888:

"The 'false reformations' here referred to are yet to be more fully seen. The view relates more particularly to those who have heard and rejected the light of the advent doctrine. They are given over to strong delusions. Such will not have 'the travail of soul for sinners' as formerly. Having rejected the advent, and being given over to the delusions of Satan, 'the time for their salvation is past.' This does not, however, relate to those who have not heard and rejected the doctrine of the second advent."

"It is a fearful thing to treat lightly the truth which has convinced our understanding and touched our hearts. We cannot with impunity reject the warnings which God in mercy sends us. A message was sent from heaven to the world in Noah's day, and the salvation of men depended upon the manner in which they treated that message. Because they rejected the warning, the Spirit of God was withdrawn from the sinful race, and they perished in the waters of the flood.

In the first partially bolded passage, written in 1854, you the reader should be able to clearly discern the confusion that results from covering one deception with another.

Notice that EGW mixes points and actually creates more confusion. She begins her defense by arguing that in the original passage, she was talking about the deceived as the "They" and "Such" who had given up their burden for the lost. She says that it was not the Adventists who gave up their burden for the lost. She then stands logic on its head and argues that these deceived Christians that had lost 'the travail of soul for sinners' were in fact hopelessly lost and that Adventists should have no burden for them!

EGW's befuddled defense is to say that the fallen Christians were damned because they given up their burden for lost souls. Therefore since they are damned and lost Adventists should abandon their burden for "these" lost! In other words, according to EGW, Adventist Christians should give up their burden for non-Adventist Christians because the non-Adventist Christians are lost for giving up their burden for other lost people? It is almost too confusing to restate!

This false logic should be clear, but there is even more. Even though we can see through the failed logic EGW puts forth and that it is really just a "cover" for her previously held false teachings, consider this: EGW says in 1854 that during the years of 1844-1850 she had only taught that Adventists should have no burden for the lost that had rejected the Advent message. But she had maintained and taught that Adventists should retain a burden for those who were lost in ignorance, i.e. those who were not Christian in any sense. This important point should not be missed. It is completely unsupportable from the historical context. In other words, it's a lie.

I admittedly am a detractor of EGW, but even her defenders have admitted that her defense is untrue, if they cannot bring themselves to call it an outright lie. Dr. Robert Olsen, Director of the White Estate wrote:

"Ellen White appears to be saying that she immediately adopted "the true position" after receiving her first vision. However, such an interpretation of her words does not seem to be in harmony with other documents of the time, especially Otis Nichols' letter to William Miller. (this was written in 1849, four plus years after 1844!)

You can reference Dr. Olsen's complete article THE "SHUT DOOR" DOCUMENTS in which this statement appears under item number 7 at www.ellen-white.com.

Adventists living between the years 1844-1850 were not just giving up their burden for a specific group of lost people. They had given up their burden for everyone who was not in the advent movement and still seeking an explanation without repudiating the 1844 teachings of William Miller. At the end of the passage EGW says,

"A message was sent from heaven to the world in Noah's day, and the salvation of men depended upon the manner in which they treated that message. Because they rejected the warning, the Spirit of God was withdrawn from the sinful race, and they perished in the waters of the flood.

For clarity consider what EGW wrote about the similarity of Noah and the End Time elsewhere.

"But the time comes when the last appeal of Noah is made to the guilty race. He bids them yet once again heed the message of warning and find refuge in the ark. He stretches out his hands in supplication with voice full of sympathy. With quivering lip and tearful eye, he tells them his work is done, but the loud, coarse mocking and scoffs and insults more determined are heaped upon Noah. Enthusiast, fanatic, crazy, falls upon his ear. He bids them all farewell, he and his family enter the ark, and God shut the door. That door that shut Noah in, shut out the world. It was a shut door in Noah's time. And the Lord shut him in. Up to that time, God had opened a door whereby the inhabitants of the old world might find refuge if they believed the message sent to them from God. But that door was now shut and no man could open it. Probation was ended. {TDG 235.2}

Clearly Ellen White's use of the comparison with Noah shows that the loss of a burden for the "wicked world" was her own and not the other Christian churches such as the Baptists! Ellen White sees probation ending in both instances, the Flood and the Last Days (her time). For years after 1844 Ellen White and other early Adventists taught that the door was shut in the identical sense as it was shut on the Ark just prior to the flood. Proof positive that her later defense is a deception or, to be gracious, just the musings of a very forgetful woman is found in this quote from EGW.

"There was a shut door in Noah's time. There was a shut door to the unbelievers in the destruction of Sodom, but an open door to Lot. There was a shut door to the inhabitants of Tyrus, a shut door to the inhabitants of Jerusalem . . . who disbelieved, but an open door to the humble, the believing, those who obeyed God. Thus it will be at the end of time. —Manuscript 17, Aug. 14, 1885, "Shipboard Meditations." {TDG 235.4}"

EGW is willing to admit Adventists taught this falsehood "for a time" but disingenuously she writes herself out of her accounts of it's teaching. The truth is that she was one of the primary contributing voices that taught this falsehood. And because of the credibility of her "visions" in Adventism she was able to kept Adventism teaching the shut door heresy for years after it would otherwise have been given up.

In The Spirit of Prophecy, volume 4, published in 1884 EGW writes. {1BIO 256.3}

"After the passing of the time of expectation, in 1844, Adventists still believed the Saviour's coming to be very near; they held that they had reached an important crisis, and that the work of Christ as man's intercessor before God had ceased. (Page 257)

I think the point is made and you the reader will understand at least enough to see that the questions of ministers and laity alike are not driven by sour grapes. The questions and responses are driven by a careful study of the issues involved. So now let's move on to a more fundamental study of the issue of the Shut Door teaching. I believe it represents a contribution to the debate in terms of providing real clarity to the debated points.

 

The Keys to the Shut Door Question

As I have said, I believe I arrived at my conclusions by looking at the available evidence before reaching a conclusion one way or the other. I simply let the facts lead me where they would. I encourage you to let the evidence speak to you before you make your mind up as well.

So let me help you see the "keys" to the issue and identify them for yourself as we review the evidence. I want to start by supplying a framework to dispel confusion. The issues on both sides of the debate concerning the "Shut Door" doctrine of early Adventism are clear but often left unexplained.

They are: "To "whom" was the door shut or open?" and "What is the door?" Finally, "What is the significance in early Adventist thinking of having the "door" shut? My opening points on the Early Writings passage should have been clear, but let's slow down and go at this more carefully. If we can answer these questions one by one with clear evidence from the people who wrote during the 1844-1850 time frame, we can make progress in understanding the issues and reaching a sound conclusion.

Let's start with the first part of the argument by defining possible answers to the "whom". Who would have a door "of any kind" open or shut to them? There are five possibilities on a scale that runs from the "wicked world" all the way to convinced Adventists in league with Ellen White, Joseph Bates etc.

  1. The "wicked", the unconverted, pre-evangelized world.
  2. Christian people who were never involved in the Millerite movement, ever.
  3. Christian people who did get involved in the Millerite movement but later became disillusioned and no longer supported it.
  4. Christian people who joined the Millerites but, confused by 1844, still looked for answers concerning their 1844 disappointment.
  5. Millerites who became Adventists and were in agreement and association with Ellen G. White after the disappointment of 1844.

Since this breakdown encompasses all the possible categories of people on earth, all "Shut Door" references by Ellen White and the early Adventist church must necessarily apply to at least one of these groups.

It should be recognized that the White Estate does not allow for the distinction between group one and group four. This is significant. The White Estate treats any reference of any kind to the preaching of the Adventist message as preaching to group one, and as such is used to defend Ellen White against closing the "door" of salvation to the "Wicked World" at large.

Evidence will show, however, that references to evangelization between 1844 and 1850 by the early Adventists and EGW are references to evangelizing group two and group four and not group one. You will be able, through provided references and independent study, to make up your own mind, but it should be a one sided debate. No passages that I have ever found indicate that evangelizing of the lost world represented evangelizing group one.

Even today the primary emphasis of evangelism in Adventism remains directed towards other Christians who are willing to listen. The subject of Adventist preaching was the Sabbath and not Calvary. This central and undeniable fact is the compelling evidence that Adventists of the period from 1844-1850 were not trying to reach the lost, but rather non-Adventist Christians. Existing copies of Adventist sermons from this time bear out this evidence by the ton. The Sabbath and not Calvary was the burden of Adventism for at least its first six years. Calvary was a secondary message in Adventism and was not preached to the lost but to Christians as a hook for leading Christians to accept the Sabbath.

Notice these passages from EGW:

"Oh, my brother and sister, I wish all of God's people could get a sight of it as God has shown it me. The work of the Lord is going on. Souls are coming in to the truth, and soon the work will be all done. Keep up good courage, hope in God, let nothing weigh thee down. We have the truth. We know it. Praise the Lord. I saw yesterday our work was not to the shepherds who have rejected the former messages, but to the honest deceived who are led astray. I saw the false shepherds would soon be fed with judgment. Let the truth come out everywhere we go, the seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord our God. Cheer up. There are better days coming.--Letter 18, 1850, p. 1. (To Brother and Sister Hastings, January 11, 1850.) {5MR 91.1}

This is a clear reference to both the Sabbath burden and the targeted church people who Adventists believed were deceived. The message was not for the un-churched and was not about Calvary.

"Let us not rest unless we have the abiding witness that our ways please God. Souls are coming out upon the truth all around here. They are those who have not heard the Advent doctrine and some of them are those who went forth to meet the Bridegroom in 1844, but since that time have been deceived by false shepherds until they did not know where they were or what they believed.--Letter 4, 1850, pp. 1, 2. (To Brother and Sister Collins, February 10, 1850.)

Here is another reference to churched people rather then the lost of the world. Notice that there is nothing here about people who were unconverted. The two groups mentioned here are groups two and four, not group one. The burden of the Adventists' witness was to preach Adventist specific doctrine to other Christians rather than the Gospel to the lost.

Again from a vision in 1850 in Paris Maine:

"Then I saw souls that were needy. They were honest, and they needed the prejudice torn from them that they have received from their leaders, (OBVIOUSLY A REFERENCE TO OTHER CHRISTIANS) and then they can receive the truth. I saw [that] the burden of the message should be the first, second, and third angels' messages, and those who had any hope in God would yield to the force of that truth. How mighty and glorious it looked to me. Oh, what privilege is ours, that of being among the children of God and believing the mighty truth--a poor, despised company, but how honored of God! {13MR 301.1}

"I saw [that] if Israel moved steadily along, going according to Bible order, they would be as terrible as an army with banners. Said the angel, "Should any tarry that have the truth and can give an explanation of it from the Word of God? No, no! They must go quickly." {13MR 301.2}

"Then I saw Brother D, that he must buckle on the armor. Said the angel, "Dost thou expect to be free from trials? Fight the good fight of faith. The angel of God will go before thee, and some souls will be benefited and receive the truth." {13MR 301.3}

"Then I saw Laodiceans. [THE NOMINAL, OR FIRST-DAY, ADVENTISTS] (THIS BOLDED REFERENCE TO NOMINAL ADVENTISTS ETC. WAS ADDED BY THE WHITE ESTATE ON ITS WEB SITE, NOT BY ME. THESE REPRESENTED GROUPS 2 AND 3) They will make a mighty effort. Will they get the victory? One who has the truth will chase a thousand, and two will put ten thousand to flight. They are coming to conclusions that bring them into close quarters, and they cannot tell where they be themselves, for they are lost in the foggy, terrible fear that takes hold of them. Anguish of spirit will seize them. Dare they admit that the door is shut? The sin against the Holy Ghost was to ascribe to Satan what belongs to God or what the Holy Ghost has done. They said the shut door was of the devil and now admit it is against their own lives. They shall die the death. Look ye at the Pattern. Follow Him, for He is meek and lowly in heart. Shut your eyes to everything but the present, saving truth."--Manuscript 11, 1850. (Written December 25, 1850, at Paris, Maine.) White Estate Washington, D. C. April 12, 1984 {13MR 301.4}

This manuscript was only released in 1984; it took a good while for it to come out. It shows clearly that EGW felt that those who rejected the Adventist teaching of the shut door were lost! Why? Because the door was shut to them! This could not be clearer. EGW is saying that the shut door is the very thing that causes these people to be lost. The idea that the door was "shut" and people were lost as a result is the point that EGW says is just as important as the Sabbath teaching in Adventism.

So integral to early Adventism was the idea that they were in the final closing moment prior to the Second Coming that EGW writes:

"I saw the commandments of God and shut door could not be separated. I saw the time for the commandments of God to shine out to His people was when the door was opening in the inner apartment of the heavenly sanctuary in 1844. Then Jesus rose up and shut the door in the outer apartment and opened the door in the inner apartment and passed into the Most Holy Place, and the faith of Israel now reaches within the second veil where Jesus now stands by the ark. I saw that Jesus had opened the door in the Most Holy Place and no man can shut it; and that since Jesus had opened the door in the Most Holy Place the commandments have been shining out and God has been testing His people on the holy Sabbath."--Letter 5, 1849, pp. 1-3. (To Brother and Sister Hastings, March 24-30, 1849.)

The burden of this letter is to show that, in the last moments prior to the Second Coming, Jesus had opened the Most Holy Place door and the Sabbath doctrine had resulted as a new test for his people, while at the same time Jesus closed the first apartment door, which was the Gospel message for the lost. Let's not miss this point. Remember that EGW considered the shut door of Noah's Ark an apt example of the Shut Door of the Sanctuary outer apartment.

From Story of Redemption we read:

"While many were blaspheming and cursing their Creator, others were frantic with fear, stretching their hands toward the ark, pleading for admittance. But this was impossible. God had closed the door, the only entrance, and shut Noah in and the ungodly out. He alone could open the door. Their fear and repentance came too late. They were compelled to know that there was a living God who was mightier than man, whom they had defied and blasphemed. They called upon Him earnestly, but His ear was not open to their cry. Some in their desperation sought to break into the ark, but that firm-made structure resisted all their efforts. Some clung to the ark until borne away with the furious surging of the waters, or their hold was broken off by rocks and trees that were hurled in every direction. {SR 67.3}

The closing of the sanctuary door was compared to the closing of the door of the Ark by EGW on more than one occasion. Positive proof is provided below:

"But the time comes when the last appeal of Noah is made to the guilty race. He bids them yet once again heed the message of warning and find refuge in the ark. He stretches out his hands in supplication with voice full of sympathy. With quivering lip and tearful eye, he tells them his work is done, but the loud, coarse mocking and scoffs and insults more determined are heaped upon Noah. Enthusiast, fanatic, crazy, falls upon his ear. He bids them all farewell, he and his family enter the ark, and God shut the door. That door that shut Noah in, shut out the world. It was a shut door in Noah's time. And the Lord shut him in. Up to that time, God had opened a door whereby the inhabitants of the old world might find refuge if they believed the message sent to them from God. But that door was now shut and no man could open it. Probation was ended. {TDG 235.2}

"The long forbearance of God had ceased, the figures in the books of God's reckoning had been accumulating, the cup of the unjust was full. Mercy then ceased and justice took the sword of vengeance. . . ." {TDG 235.3}

"There was a shut door in Noah's time. There was a shut door to the unbelievers in the destruction of Sodom, but an open door to Lot. There was a shut door to the inhabitants of Tyrus, a shut door to the inhabitants of Jerusalem . . . who disbelieved, but an open door to the humble, the believing, those who obeyed God. Thus it will be at the end of time.--Manuscript 17, Aug. 14, 1885, "Shipboard Meditations." {TDG 235.4}"

Again in The Spirit of Prophecy, volume 4, published in 1884. {1BIO 256.3}

"After the passing of the time of expectation, in 1844, Adventists still believed the Saviour's coming to be very near; they held that they had reached an important crisis, and that the work of Christ as man's intercessor before God had ceased. (Page 257)

"Having given the warning of the judgment near, they felt that their work for the world was done, and they lost their burden of soul for the salvation of sinners, while the bold and blasphemous scoffing of the ungodly seemed to them another evidence that the Spirit of God had been withdrawn from the rejecters of His mercy. All this confirmed them in the belief that probation had ended, or, as they expressed it, "the door of mercy was shut."--4SP, p. 268. {1BIO 256.4}

WOW! How could it be any clearer? It is incredible, however, that EGW makes no reference to herself when, all during this time, she had used the terminology of the "Shut Door" to people whom she admits would understand it as a reference to the closing of the door of salvation and the end of probation for the lost world.

Now let's clarify by using a simple example. If I were to hold out my hand and say to you, "Slap me five!" or similarly, if I held my hand up and said, "High Five!" any American living today would understand what I meant because my words would be in today's jargon. The person I said it to would slap my hand signifying excitement and agreement. The culture knows what those phrases mean. It was just so in EGW's time. A "High Five" would not be understood in her time, 150 years ago, and likewise we don't understand the "Shut Door" without a little background. But now that we have the background, the conclusion is impossible to miss.

Ellen White and other early Adventist leaders were not writing and speaking the term "Shut Door" to their followers and giving it a meaning different from the understanding the people universally held. It is simply not credible to assert as the Defenders of EGW claim, that while some believed the "Shut Door" was shut to all the lost, EGW at the same time used the same term but gave it a different meaning when communicating to other Adventists! By definition that would not be communication; it would be confusion! Now that is clear, isn't it? Remember: Ellen White herself said,

"All this confirmed them in the belief that probation had ended, or, as they expressed it, "the door of mercy was shut."--4SP, p. 268. {1BIO 256.4}

Once again Dr. Robert Olsen, a former Director of the White Estate, makes special mention of EGW's "oversight" when not counting herself among those who taught that the door of salvation to sinners was closed. In his article THE "SHUT DOOR" DOCUMENTS under item number 7 he writes:

"Ellen White appears to be saying that she immediately adopted "the true position" after receiving her first vision. However, such an interpretation of her words does not seem to be in harmony with other documents of the time, especially Otis Nichols' letter to William Miller. (this was written in 1849, four plus years after 1844!)

"It seems more likely that Ellen's first vision confirmed the validity of the 1844 experience and, with subsequent visions, led her gradually to the realization that, while the door of mercy had indeed closed for some on October 22, it had not closed for all. At first she was struck with the fact that there was no more hope for the "wicked world" or for those who denied God's leading in the Millerite movement. As the years passed she was evidently more and more impressed by that part of her vision which mentioned the 144,000 who were yet to be gathered out of the world before the Lord's return. What was intended to underscore divine leadership in the Millerite movement and to portray a large [p. 6] ingathering of souls was at first misinterpreted to mean that her work for the world was done.

These passages represent a complete capitulation to the detractors of Ellen White and the facts that current Ellen White defenders try to deny. How could it be that Dr. Olsen, arguably the most pro-EGW writer of his time, the director and representative of Mrs. Whites complete works held in trust by the Seventh-day Adventist Church, is able to admit that Mrs. White's statements are misleading (although he would argue unintentionally)? The answer is simple. An honest examination of the evidence leads even the most loyal defenders to the same raw conclusions as those who have abandoned their faith in Ellen White as a true prophet. But even with this said, those with less aptitude to evaluate the evidence, or worse, those with less honesty, disallow Adventists the right to conclude that EGW was a "false prophet" when using a biblical definition of that term.

The only real difference between what Dr. Olsen admits and what I am writing is the conclusion. Dr. Olsen says it is no problem that EGW "misunderstood" her heavenly visions and taught falsehood. But you be the judge; Dr. Olsen defends EGW with his words and hers:

"That seventeen-year-old Ellen should misinterpret one of her visions should elicit no surprise when one remembers that the Bible prophets found it necessary to study their own writings in the endeavor to find out what their prophecies meant (1 Peter 1:10,11). At one time the apostle Peter mistakenly believed in a shut door. In fact, he thought that, as far as the Gentiles were concerned, the door of mercy had never been open. Somehow he misinterpreted Isaiah 56:6-8, as well as Christ's command recorded in Matthew 28:19 and Acts 1:8. Eventually, in the vision at Cornelius' house (Acts 10), Peter discovered "the true position."

Concerning her own experience, Ellen White wrote:

"Often representations are given me which at first I do not understand. But after a time they are made plain by a repeated presentation of those things that I did not at first comprehend, in ways that make their meaning clear and unmistakable.--Selected Messages, book 3, p. 56."

"For 60 years I have been in communication with heavenly messengers, and I have been constantly learning in reference to divine things.--Letter 86, 1906; This Day With God, p. 76."

Dr. Olsen's extensive knowledge of Ellen White's writing make it difficult for me to believe his defense is entirely candid. Consider these quotes from Ellen White which she wrote about how she related her visions and about their trustworthiness as messages from God:

"At times I am carried far ahead into the future and shown what is to take place. Then again I am shown things as they have occurred in the past. After I come out of vision I do not at once remember all that I have seen, and the matter is not so clear before me until I write, then the scene rises before me as was presented in vision, and I can write with freedom. Sometimes the things which I have seen are hid from me after I come out of vision, and I cannot call them to mind until I am brought before a company where that vision applies, then the things which I have seen come to my mind with force. I am just as dependent upon the Spirit of the Lord in relating or writing a vision, as in having the vision. It is impossible for me to call up things which have been shown me unless the Lord brings them before me at the time that He is pleased to have me relate or write them. Spiritual Gifts (1860), vol. 2, pp. 292, 293.

"The question is asked, how does Sister White know in regard to the matters of which she speaks so decidedly, as if she had authority to say these things? I speak thus because they flash upon my mind when in perplexity like lightning out of a dark cloud in the fury of a storm. Some scenes presented before me years ago have not been retained in my memory, but when the instruction then given is needed, sometimes even when I am standing before the people, the remembrance comes sharp and clear, like a flash of lightning, bringing to mind distinctly that particular instruction. At such times I cannot refrain from saying the things that flash into my mind, not because I have had a new vision, but because that which was presented to me perhaps years in the past has been recalled to my mind forcibly." The Writing and Sending Out of the Testimonies, p.24.

So again, you be the judge. It seems painfully obvious that EGW believes that her understanding is that she is "just as dependent upon the Spirit of the Lord in relating or writing a vision, as in having the vision. It is impossible for me to call up things which have been shown me unless the Lord brings them before me at the time that He is pleased to have me relate or write them."

After reading that, should we accept the defense that EGW taught error because God was not clear enough to keep her from misunderstanding what He told her? Should we not take EGW at her word that she relates the visions with just as much reliance on God as when she received them? According to EGW's words above, in order for Dr. Olsen to maintain his current defense, he would have to argue that God "misunderstood" what He wanted to say!

No, the Bible is a far better guide then the misunderstandings of Ellen White, and in it we read in Deuteronomy 18:20-22:

"But the prophet, which shall presume to speak a word in my name, which I have not commanded him to speak, or that shall speak in the name of other gods, even that prophet shall die. And if thou say in thine heart, How shall we know the word which the LORD hath not spoken? When a prophet speaketh in the name of the LORD, if the thing follow not, nor come to pass, that is the thing which the LORD hath not spoken, but the prophet hath spoken it presumptuously: thou shalt not be afraid of him."

And in Lamentations 2:14:

"Thy prophets have seen vain and foolish things for thee: and they have not discovered thine iniquity, to turn away thy captivity; but have seen for thee false burdens and causes of banishment."

Matthew 24:11:

"And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many."

1 John 4:1:

"Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world."

I leave it to you, as a person of integrity before God, what other decision can be reached regarding Ellen White's trustworthiness than she fails to meet the test of these Bible passages on the issue of the Shut Door? What decision must we therefore make regarding the authenticity of her claims of inspiration?

It is not enough to point out Ellen White's many fine and laudable contributions in other areas. Adventists must not forget that Ellen White became a recognized prophet within Adventism on the basis of teaching this false doctrine and other early false teachings that Adventists accepted at the time. However, we today, with the wealth of evidence before us, cannot with good conscience do the same. Our verdict must be consistent with the evidence.

With this evidence we can see Ellen White was speaking about herself when she denounced the fanatics who held on to the Shut Door doctrine when she wrote:

"But the idea that the work of the gospel was finished was soon renounced, except by some fanatical ones who would neither be counseled nor receive instruction". The Early Years Volume One

Remember, Dr. Olsen in his "Shut Door Documents" clearly wrote that Ellen White was one of those who would not soon renounce this heresy:

"At first she was struck with the fact that there was no more hope for the "wicked world" or for those who denied God's leading in the Millerite movement. As the years passed she was evidently more and more impressed by that part of her vision which mentioned the 144,000 who were yet to be gathered out of the world before the Lord's return. What was intended to underscore divine leadership in the Millerite movement and to portray a large [p. 6] ingathering of souls was at first misinterpreted to mean that her work for the world was done."

One such occasion where more thoughtful people wanted to give up the shut door but Ellen White wanted to hold on to the idea is related by EGW herself.

"There was one sister there that was called very spiritual. She had traveled and been a powerful preacher the most of the time for twenty years. She had been truly a mother in Israel. But a division had risen in the band on the shut door. She had great sympathy, and could not believe the door was shut. (I had known nothing of their difference.) Sister Durben got up to talk. I felt very, very sad.

"At length my soul seemed to be in an agony, and while she was talking I fell from my chair to the floor. It was then I had a view of Jesus rising from His mediatorial throne and going to the holiest as Bridegroom to receive His kingdom. They were all deeply interested in the view. They all said it was entirely new to them. The Lord worked in mighty power setting the truth home to their hearts.

"Sister Durben knew what the power of the Lord was, for she had felt it many times; and a short time after I fell she was struck down, and fell to the floor, crying to God to have mercy on her. When I came out of vision, my ears were saluted with Sister Durben's singing and shouting with a loud voice.

"Most of them received the vision, and were settled upon the shut door."--Letter 3, 1847. (To Joseph Bates, July 13, 1847)

The meaning of this is perfectly clear. Sister Durben was one of those who wanted to quickly give up her belief in the door of salvation being shut to the lost, but EGW provides a vision that held Sister Durben and the others in their error. Dr. Olsen had it right on the mark.

 

THE NEXT QUESTIONS RELATE TO THE "DOOR":

Primarily the question is "what is the 'door' that is shut?" Along with that central question there are others that we will seek to answer such asis there "one" door or "two"? If there are "two doors", how do these doors relate to one another? What do the early Adventists understand about these doors? What message were early Adventists preaching about these doors that was of such great importance? What did Ellen White have to say about these doors?

What is the "door" that is shut?

Early Millerites began referring to a "door" in their message in reference to the door of Matthew 24 where the bridegroom comes to take those virgins who are ready. Most scholars are careful to note that the story refers to Christians that are ready and Christians who are not because all are "virgins". That is to say it is not a parable of "virgins" verses "harlots" or the "Wicked World" which would illustrate the saved and lost of the world. No, it is a passage that only speaks about professed Christians.

Consistent with this idea that the parable dealt with Christians, Millerites taught that the Christian world was being divided into two groups. First, there were those that accepted the message about the 1844 "Test" and later the "Tests" of the Sabbath and other special "truths" involving the soon coming of Jesus. Believers were therefore tested and saved based on their having accepted the "Test" issue. In the second group were those who rejected the message of time and later the Sabbath and made themselves "Babylon" and were confused, deceived and lost as a result of that rejection i.e. virgins without oil. However, the "Wicked World" is not even in the discussion; the wicked are all lost from the outset by their having never accepted Jesus in the first place.

Later, as we read in the quote above along with others such as Joseph Turner, Ellen White began to introduce the idea of the two doors in the Sanctuary in heaven. The idea comes from the outer and inner apartments of the Sanctuary of Israel. There were two "apartments," and each had a door or curtain. With this new framework Adventists ushered in the idea of two doors and a new explanation for the 1844 disappointment. This explanation was not possible using only the story of the Bridegroom of Matthew 24, which was a more simple explanation with only one door.

With the early teaching that only knew of the door of the Bridegroom, the Millerites/Adventists were left with only one simple conclusion with regard to those who were not following "truth" (to be equated with people who did not agree with Adventists) after 1844: anyone who was not already an Adventist was lost. With the new understanding of Joseph Turner and Ellen White, the idea that "most" were lost but not all began to be taught; time was short now for the world, but not completely over. According to Ellen White and like-minded Adventists, some confused souls who had already begun to trust in Christ might still be saved since they were inside the first door before it was shut.

Mrs. White believed and taught that those who were never Christian and those who had given up trying to find the truth in the Millerite experience of 1844 could not be saved. She taught that the door of salvation was shut to all but those whose experience of 1844 had led them past the first door of the heavenly sanctuary and into the second door. Only those who had entered the first door by their Christian experience were capable of hearing the message of the second apartment.

Ellen White writes clearly about those that are already in Christ but who still need Adventist "present truth." She never wrote about the lost who did not get in beyond the first shut door prior to 1844.

"The Lord has shown me that precious souls are starving, and dying for want of the present, sealing truth, the meat in due season; and that the swift messengers should speed on their way, and feed the flock with the present truth. I heard an Angel say, "speed the swift messengers, speed the swift messengers; for the case of every soul will soon be decided, either for Life, or for Death."--Ellen G. White, The Present Truth, Sept., 1849, pp. 31-32.

The Ellen White Estate defends Ellen White, saying that her writings allow for the salvation of even those who did not enter in through the first door. They don't stop there. They add that Mrs. White was partially right in saying that there was a shut door or close of probation in 1844. They agree with Mrs. White when she says that those who went through the Millerite experience and then later rejected the experience of 1844 are hopelessly lost.

That is quite a defense. They admit EGW says that the Baptists, Methodists, and Presbyterians who rejected Adventism are forever lost, but they say she allows those still open to Adventism a chance to be saved. It sounds incredible, but that is the defense.

Ellen White used that same defense all her life in an attempt to keep her early shut door comments from looking totally nonsensical:

"I am still a believer in the shut-door theory, but not in the sense in which we at first employed the term or in which it is employed by my opponents. There was a shut door in Noah's day. There was at that time a withdrawal of the Spirit of God from the sinful race that perished in the waters of the Flood. God Himself gave the shut-door message to Noah: "My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years" (Gen. 6:3)."

"There was a shut door in the days of Abraham. Mercy ceased to plead with the inhabitants of Sodom, and all but Lot, with his wife and two daughters, were consumed by the fire sent down from heaven. There was a shut door in Christ's day. The Son of God declared to the unbelieving Jews of that generation, "Your house is left unto you desolate" (Matt. 23:38).

"Looking down the stream of time to the last days, the same infinite power proclaimed through John: 'These things saith he that is holy, he that is true, he that hath the key of David, he that openeth, and no man shutteth; and shutteth, and no man openeth' (Rev. 3:7)."

"I was shown in vision, and I still believe, that there was a shut door in 1844. All who saw the light of the first and second angels' messages and rejected that light were left in darkness. And those who accepted it and received the Holy Spirit which attended the proclamation of the message from heaven, and who afterward renounced their faith and pronounced their experience a delusion, thereby rejected the Spirit of God, and it no longer pleaded with them.

"Those who did not see the light had not the guilt of its rejection. It was only the class who had despised the light from heaven that the Spirit of God could not reach. And this class included, as I have stated, both those who refused to accept the message when it was presented to them, and also those who, having received it, afterward renounced their faith. These might have a form of godliness, and profess to be followers of Christ; (Page 261) but having no living connection with God, they would be taken captive by the delusions of Satan.--MS 4, 1883 (see also 1SM, pp. 63, 64). The Early Years Volume One Page 260.

Ellen White here includes those who heard the "First" and the "Second" Angels message, not just the third. She is saying that if anyone had ever heard the message of the Gospel and had not responded prior to the cutoff of 1844 they were then doomed for eternity without the chance to be saved. While she writes these words years later in an attempt to "correct" herself in regard to the Shut Door doctrine, she is still ringing the same heretical bell.

One last point before we close. The White Estate is comfortable with the explanation that EGW taught mistaken and confused interpretations for her visions. Dr. Olsen wrote:

"That seventeen-year-old Ellen should misinterpret one of her visions should elicit no surprise when one remembers that the Bible prophets found it necessary to study their own writings in the endeavor to find out what their prophecies meant (1 Peter 1:10,11). At one time the apostle Peter mistakenly believed in a shut door. In fact, he thought that, as far as the Gentiles were concerned, the door of mercy had never been open. Somehow he misinterpreted Isaiah 56:6-8, as well as Christ's command recorded in Matthew 28:19 and Acts 1:8. Eventually, in the vision at Cornelius' house (Acts 10), Peter discovered "the true position."

I would like to address this defense. The problem with this explanation is that Peter's errors were immediately corrected by God's direct revelation in vision. God's revelations did not compound Peter's confusion, as is the case Dr. Olsen argues for Ellen White!

Don't the extraordinary claims of Adventism require extraordinary credibility to be believable? I would think so. But what we have instead is confusion, obscurity and false teaching by everyone's account, even the White Estate.

Perhaps the best way to close is with a short but clear examination of a quote from Ellen White from an early vision intended to bring comfort to the disappointed Millerites.

January 24, 1846 Letter from Sister Harmon to Bro Jacobs. Portland, Me., Dec. 20, 1845:

"While praying at the family altar, the Holy Ghost fell on me, and I seemed to be rising higher and higher, far above the dark world. I turned to look for the Advent people in the world, but could not find them--when a voice said to me, "Look again, and look a little higher." At this I raised my eyes and saw a straight and narrow path, [MAT. 7:14.] cast up high above the world. On this path the Advent people were travelling to the City, which was at the farther end of the path. They had a bright light set up behind them at the first end of the path, which an angel told me was the Midnight Cry. [MAT. 25:6.] This light shone all along the path, and gave light for their feet so they might not stumble. And if they kept their eyes fixed on Jesus, who was just before them, leading them to the City, they were safe. But soon some grew weary, and they said the City was a great way off, and they expected to have entered it before. Then Jesus would encourage them by raising his glorious right arm, and from his arm came a glorious light which waved over the Advent band, and they shouted Hallelujah! Others rashly denied the light behind them, and said that it was not God that had led them out so far. The light behind them went out leaving their feet in perfect darkness, and they stumbled and got their eyes off the mark and lost sight of Jesus, and fell off the path down in the dark and wicked world below. It was just as impossible for them to get on the path again and go to the City, as all the wicked world which God had rejected. They fell all the way along the path one after another, until we heard the voice of God like many waters, [EZE. 43:2. JOEL 3:16. REV. 16:17.] which gave us the day and hour of Jesus' coming.

In this passage Ellen White expounds her understanding that the believers who got off the path fell among another group, the "wicked world which God had rejected." In this early vision Ellen White sees a group of Christians in a testing time, as they continue faithfully they march the path to Glory, but when these Christians fail and give up the "Truths" of Adventism they fall off the path and join the "wicked world" representing the lost who never got on the path to begin with.

The imagery is simple and striking. The Adventist mind saw everything in terms of the three angels' messages. Current Adventist beliefs and actions show that the things that Ellen White and the early Adventists believed and preached were false teachings; even Adventists no longer teach them.

I call on you as a thinking person, in prayerful reflection and humility before God, to consider the content of this article. Can we as believers in God's word support, trust or believe in the work of Ellen White when her visions led her to teach false doctrine as Dr. Olsen argues we should? Another way of asking the question might be, if for the first five years of her prophetic ministry Ellen White was a false prophet, at what point was she no longer a false prophet? Did some great dividing line occur that changed the nature of her deception? Did she repent of her false teaching? Or did she deny she was ever wrong? Did she confess her errors openly? Or did she pile layers of "words" over them to obscure them? An honest answer to these questions should lead to an expansion of the term "Babylon" for Adventists to include Adventism itself.

 

Copyright 2002 David DePinho. Used by permission.

 

Copyright 1999-2007 Graphics Studio, Redlands, CA USA. All rights reserved. Revised August 1, 2007. Use of this site and forum signifies your acceptance of the Terms and Conditions. Send comments and questions to formeradventist@gmail.com

HOME ......|...... FORUM ......|...... OUR STORIES ......|...... BIBLE STUDIES ......|...... FAF WEEKENDS ......|...... ABOUT US ......|...... RELATED WEBSITES