Author |
Message |
Denisegilmore
| Posted on Sunday, November 05, 2000 - 12:16 am: |    |
Ya know Max, that question didn't even enter my head at the time. I was caught off guard I guess. I will ask that. I did however, point out verses that says the law was done away with along with its ordinances. I was told that the ordinances were in fact done away with but not the law. It was my attempt to prove to them from Scripture that it was the law with ordinances. Would you please tell me where the verse is that actually states the law, 'engraved in stone', is what is being talked about. To save my life I couldn't even think where that was in Scripture. Yet I know it is there as I've read it over and over. Infact, it was that verse that confirmed everything I had read with regards to the law. I am blank even as I type as to where that is located in Paul's writings. It was amazing though how God works because there were verses I didn't know I knew that I pointed out. It had to be the Holy Spirit. Have you ever had that happen to you? Thank you. God bless, Denise |
Max
| Posted on Sunday, November 05, 2000 - 12:38 am: |    |
NIV 2 Corinthians 3:2 You yourselves are our letter, written on our hearts, known and read by everybody. 3 You show that you are a letter from Christ, the result of our ministry, written not with ink but with the Spirit of the living God, not on tablets of stone but on tablets of human hearts. 4 Such confidence as this is ours through Christ before God. 5 Not that we are competent in ourselves to claim anything for ourselves, but our competence comes from God. 6 He has made us competent as ministers of a new covenant--not of the letter but of the Spirit; for the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life. 7 Now if the ministry that brought death, which was engraved in letters on stone, came with glory, so that the Israelites could not look steadily at the face of Moses because of its glory, fading though it was, 8 will not the ministry of the Spirit be even more glorious? 9 If the ministry that condemns men is glorious, how much more glorious is the ministry that brings righteousness! 10 For what was glorious has no glory now in comparison with the surpassing glory. 11 And if what was fading away came with glory, how much greater is the glory of that which lasts! |
Denisegilmore
| Posted on Sunday, November 05, 2000 - 1:29 am: |    |
Max, thank you so much for reminding where that is located in the Bible. I was looking in 1 Cor. 3 and in Colossians and of course with a time constraint as sometimes others get a little edgy when I'm searching for a Scripture. This Scripture is now logged in my brain. God Bless, Denise |
Jtree
| Posted on Sunday, November 05, 2000 - 6:58 am: |    |
Max, here is what EGW states concerning Exodus 16:29, me not being a FRIEND, can you tell us what is wrong with Ol' Ellen's teaching? "verse 29. See. The patience of God toward His stubborn people is amazing, and teaches an important lesson to us who tend to be impatient. Instead of always punishing Israel for their repeated murmurings and acts of disobedience, God condescends to reason with them, explaining the purpose of His requirements. The Sabbath was a holy day of rest, with which they were not to tamper; hence, the double portion of food the day before. Abide ye every man. The Israelites were directed to remain in camp on the Sabbath, and not to go out for manna or for any other purpose. Their time on that day was to be spent in rest at home and in meditation upon sacred themes. God had already instructed Israel to assemble for worship on days designated as ìholyî (ch. 12:16), a practice that was consistently applied to other ìholyî days (see Lev. 23:2ñ4, 7, 8, 21, 24, 27, 35ñ37). In postexilic times the Jews set up and enforced strict regulations concerning the leaving of cities or villages on the Sabbath. No one was permitted to travel farther than 2,000 cubits, or approximately two thirds of a mile. In the NT this distance is commonly referred to as ìa sabbath dayís journeyî (Acts 1:12). Endless, man-made Sabbath regulations have been strictly followed by orthodox Jews even since Bible times, with the result that the Sabbath, designed by God to be a delight (Isa. 58:13), became a burden. 30. The people rested. Finding no manna Sabbath morning, and rebuked for going out to find it, the people began to rest on the Sabbath day. SDA Bible Commentary" |
Jtree
| Posted on Sunday, November 05, 2000 - 7:25 am: |    |
Clarify something. "Me not a FRIEND" meaning, I'm not an Adventist, nor a former, but a spouse of a former. |
Max
| Posted on Sunday, November 05, 2000 - 9:52 am: |    |
Morning friend Joshua, Concerning the SDABC "explanation" for the "do not leave your place" command, here's what comes to my mind: 1. There's too much speculation in the passage and not enough reliance on the available archaeological, historical and scriptural data. 2. The "Sabbath-day's journey" was closer to a half mile than two-thirds of a mile. 3. ^^The Israelites were directed to remain in camp on the Sabbath, and not to go out for manna or for any other purpose.^^ To interpret a Scripture which clearly says, "remain every man of you in his place, let no man go out of his placed on the seventh day" (RSV) as "The Israelites were directed to remain in camp on the Sabbath" is sheer sleight-of-hand sophistry and another example of SDA willingness to "say anything to get elected" by gullible Protestants who "know neither the Scriptures nor the power of God" and are thus fair game for such trickery. 3. Nowhere in Scripture is there a "Sabbath day's journey" command. That was one of the "traditions of men" that Jesus thundered against. There is only a reference to that man-made tradition in the New Testament. 4. What was designed by God to be a "delight" to people just out of slavery, which forced them to work on the seventh day, was the Sabbath itself. The Fourth Commandment was thus A LABOR LAW. The Jews LIBERALIZED this labor law by starting a "tradition of man" called "the Sabbath day's journey" which, as you know, allowed people to BREAK the Exodus 16:29 law. And our friends the Adventists have siezed on this anomaly to deceive people into thinking that going to church, for example, on the Sabbath is KEEPING rather than BREAKING the Exodus 16:29 law. Conclusion: SDAs continue to do exactly what the Jews were doing: finding ways to break the law of God. Thus they fulfill the prophecies of Paul that said God put the law there to show people that they cannot keep it, to point people to Christ (who broke the Sabbath laws by EXCEEDING them in righteousness) who declares us righteous and sinless. In other words, Exodus 16:29 shows that SDAs are legalists of the highest order and distressingly in need of the gospel. Max of the Cross |
Jtree
| Posted on Sunday, November 05, 2000 - 10:18 am: |    |
Max, that was awsome....clap clap clap. My hat off to you Brother. |
Max
| Posted on Sunday, November 05, 2000 - 7:42 pm: |    |
What do you mean, Joshua? |
Bruceh
| Posted on Sunday, November 05, 2000 - 8:24 pm: |    |
Max That was great. Bruce Heinrich |
Max
| Posted on Sunday, November 05, 2000 - 11:46 pm: |    |
Joshua, Do you think this is some kind of contest? I know that Bruce is sincere because I've known him personally for about a year. But I would really like an answer to my question to you. Your brother in Christ, Max |
Jtree
| Posted on Monday, November 06, 2000 - 9:26 am: |    |
Max, I have known Bruce over a 1 1/2. What I was saying the response to the SDABC was very very nicely put. And I appreciated it very much, I gave an AMEN, and clapped very well to show my appreciation to your clarification. Again thank you. Your brother in Christ, Also! Joshua |
Max
| Posted on Monday, November 06, 2000 - 1:16 pm: |    |
Thanks Joshua, But I merit no clapping. As I've said a number of times on this web site, I am driven. This is something that God in his sovereignty has driven me -- as he did Johah so long ago -- to do. WE Matthew 5: 14 `You are like light in the world. A city built on a hill cannot be hidden. 15 So also with a lamp. People do not light a lamp and put it under a basket. But they put it on the place for a lamp. Then all the people in the house can see its light. 16 So, let your light shine to all people. Then they will see the good things you do. And they will praise your Father in heaven.' Your brother in Christ, |
Max
| Posted on Monday, November 06, 2000 - 1:59 pm: |    |
Ps. Praise your FATHER in heaven, not YOU. Scripture, my friend, Scripture will never lead you astray. |
Max
| Posted on Monday, November 06, 2000 - 5:38 pm: |    |
Some come to the FAF web site because they have been shunned by their families and friends still in Adventism and especially by their Adventist congregations. They need help, fellowship, prayer, time to vent and cry, and most of all to feast abundantly at the gospel table with like-minded Christians. For them FAF can serve as a kind of half-way house. Most of these then move on to local grace congregations in non-Adventist churches and don't visit FAF as much here anymore because they don't need to. Others of us stay here in order to help those in such transition. Still others use FAF as a vehicle to preach the gospel. A paraphrase of Matthew 10:5-10 shows why and how: ^^These FAFers Jesus sent out with the following instructions: "DO NOT go among the Protestants or enter any town of the Catholics. But go rather to the Seventh-day Adventists. And as you go, preach this message: 'The kingdom of heaven is near.' Heal the sick. Raise the dead. Cleanse those who have leprosy. Drive out demons. Freely you have received, freely give. Do not take along any gold or silver or copper in your belts; take no bag for the journey, or extra tunic, or sandals or a staff; for the worker is worth his keep."^^ Who among us has heard this summons? Max of the Cross |
Bruceh
| Posted on Monday, November 06, 2000 - 7:27 pm: |    |
Jtree How have things been going for you and your web sight, I have not been there for about a year. Bruce HEINRICH |
Darrell
| Posted on Wednesday, November 08, 2000 - 11:12 am: |    |
In Col 2:16 Paul may have meant let no one judge you about whether or not you observe a sabbath, or he may have meant let no one judge you about how you observe a sabbath. In the absence of a definitive answer about what he meant, I assume he meant both. It does not make sense to me to try to apply old covenant regulations to Christians under the new covenant who for whatever reason and in whatever manner observe sabbath. Isn't this the same as the sabbatarian condemning the non-sabbatarian? |
Max
| Posted on Wednesday, November 08, 2000 - 1:22 pm: |    |
I think you're right, Darrell. I too think he meant both. The issue is not what the believer does in relation to time (1/7th of a week), but what he does in relation to God and to other believers (not judging them). NIV Romans 14:5-6. "One man considers one day (Friday or Saturday or Sunday) more sacred than another; another man considers every day alike. Each one should be fully convinced in his own mind. He who regards one day as special, does so to the Lord." The same is true of food. NIV Colossians 2:16. "Do not let anyone judge you by what you eat or drink." Expanded in NIV Romans 14:1-4. "Accept him whose faith is weak, without passing judgment on disputable matters. One man's faith allows him to eat everything [NOT excluding pork offered to idols], but another man, whose faith is weak, eats only vegetables [a "safe" practice, since vegetables were not offered to idols. Paul's NOT talking about veganism / vegetarianism here]. The man who eats everything must not look down on him who does not, and the man who does not eat everything must not condemn the man who does, for God has accepted him. Who are you to judge someone else's servant? To his own master he stands or falls. And he will stand, for the Lord is able to make him stand." |
|