Early Adventism, Slavery, and the Ten... Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Edit Profile

Former Adventist Fellowship Forum » ARCHIVED DISCUSSIONS 8 » Early Adventism, Slavery, and the Ten Commandments « Previous Next »

  Thread Last Poster Posts Pages Last Post
  Start New Thread        

Author Message
Bskillet
Registered user
Username: Bskillet

Post Number: 102
Registered: 8-2008
Posted on Tuesday, January 20, 2009 - 5:09 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

If I recall correctly, early Seventh-day Adventists were opposed to slavery in the U.S.
At the same time, they claimed through EGW that the Ten Commandments are God's eternal Law, were given at creation, and are binding on all created beings everywhere.

It hit me today that these two beliefs--abolition of slavery and the Ten Commandments--are inconsistent. Why?

Because the Ten Commandments protected an Israelite person's right to own slaves.


quote:

Do not covet your neighbor's house. Do not covet your neighbor's wife, his male or female slave, his ox or donkey, or anything that belongs to your neighbor (Ex 20:17).


The OT ban against coveting an Israelite neighbor's slave directly implies the neighbor's slave is his possession by the right of the law.

In fact, for various reasons the Old Covenant Law protected the ownership of slaves in other passages(Ex. 21:2,Lev 25:44).

If the Ten Commandment are the eternal Law of God, then human slavery is an eternally sanctioned institution. You cannot be an abolitionist and an Ellen White-ist.

For us in the Western World today, this is a moot point: Slavery has been abolished and no one in their right mind desires to bring it back. But in the ante-bellum era in which SDA-ism was born, slavery was still practiced in the South. (Slavery is still common today in the Islamic world, but that is another story altogether.)

Those who know history know that anti-abolitionists defended slavery by using passages in the Old Covenant Law. Adventists were inconsistent on this point, demanding that the Law is binding on the Christian, while also demanding that slavery was evil.

(Message edited by bskillet on January 20, 2009)
Bobj
Registered user
Username: Bobj

Post Number: 401
Registered: 1-2006


Posted on Wednesday, January 21, 2009 - 3:37 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

So much for the viewpoint that the new covenant is just a warmed-up version of the old covenant, but now written in our hearts!
Flyinglady
Registered user
Username: Flyinglady

Post Number: 6364
Registered: 3-2004


Posted on Wednesday, January 21, 2009 - 3:55 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Thanks for bringing that to our attention.
Diana L
Colleentinker
Registered user
Username: Colleentinker

Post Number: 9294
Registered: 12-2003


Posted on Wednesday, January 21, 2009 - 4:38 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Great point, Bskillet!

Colleen
Freedom55
Registered user
Username: Freedom55

Post Number: 18
Registered: 3-2008
Posted on Wednesday, January 21, 2009 - 9:00 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

You make a compelling argument.

Add Your Message Here
Posting is currently disabled in this topic. Contact your discussion moderator for more information.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration