Author |
Message |
Jackob Registered user Username: Jackob
Post Number: 425 Registered: 7-2005
| Posted on Saturday, February 03, 2007 - 5:31 am: | |
Walter Martin was big lied by the SDA chruch, and also Martin Luther was big lied by the RCC, both churches modifying their religious terminology in such a way as to deceive true believers in the gospel that they are preaching the true gospel. The RCC in 1541 at Ratisbon was willing to adopt the protestant slogan of justification by faith, but the change was not in substance, but only in form, another similarity to the SDA attempt to appear evangelicals. Unfortunately, Walter Martin was not Martin Luther. It's my pleasure to commend Luther as a great man of God who was really interested in maintaining the truth about the gospel, also the truth about the enemies of the gospel. I discovered an article from which I will quote
quote:between the Diet of Augsburg in 1530, and that of Ratisbon in 1541, a marked and striking change occurred in the policy of the Romish party. Instead of denouncing the Protestant doctrine of Justification, as a dangerous novelty, directly opposed to the teaching of the Romish Church, they were now prepared ostensibly to adopt it as their own, ó to claim it, even, as a part of that truth which they had always held and taught, ó and to make it appear, that there was no real, or, at least, no radical, difference between the two parties, but only such as might be easily adjusted by mutual explanation and concession. Hence originated a long series of conferences, appointed by the Emperor, and attended by the Reformers, with the avowed object, on the part of their powerful promoters, of effecting a settlement by means of conciliation and compromise.
They first concocted an article which was satisfactory to neither party, quote:It had too much of the Gospel in it to be palatable to the consistent adherents of Rome, and too much of disguised legalism to be acceptable to the Reformed.
What's interesting is Marin Luther's reaction
quote:the same doctrine of Justification which had been openly rejected as a 'novelty,' at direct variance with the teaching of the Church, came to be regarded in an entirely different light, and even to be claimed as a truth which had always been taught by the priests and bishops of Rome
This is exactly how the SDA church acted: 1. SDA condemned the rest of the evangelical churches as being Babylon, aspostate, teachign a false gospel of "cheap grace" 2. Questioned by Walter Martin, they answered" We alwasys preached the gospel of justification by faith alone" Amazing, huh? Big lie, historical lie, no one can miss it, the reaction of Martin Luther was
quote:Luther, marking this sudden change, could hardly restrain his indignant sarcasm, and exclaimed, 'Popish writers pretend that they have always taught, what we now teach, concerning faith and good works, and that they are unjustly accused of the contrary: thus the wolf puts on the sheep's skin till he gains admission into the fold.'
That's the difference between Martin Luther and Walter Martin: Martin Luther had opened his eyes, Walter Martin closed his eyes. Even after Des Ford and a lot of adventists pastors and members suffered persecution at the hands of the SDA organization, he kept his eyes closed to the fact that nothing changed regarding the gospel in the SDA church. (Message edited by Jackob on February 03, 2007) |
River Registered user Username: River
Post Number: 483 Registered: 9-2006
| Posted on Saturday, February 03, 2007 - 10:42 am: | |
Jacob, I enjoyed that, your post and Ramoneís post got me to thinking about parallels. Another parallel I see is in your letters like MartinCís letter to the Adventist church put me in the mind of Martin Lutherís own 95 theses that he nailed to the door of the church. Now me being of sort of a comical mind I can envision some former such as Martinc going up to the church door carrying his framing hammer and a large rusty nail spike and hammering it through his letter right straight through a nicely finished front door late Friday night. Whap, whap, whap, wham!! And then walking a way to get in his car carefully adjusting his seat belt and calmly driving off. I found the thought rather amusing, must be getting tired. River
|
Colleentinker Registered user Username: Colleentinker
Post Number: 5370 Registered: 12-2003
| Posted on Saturday, February 03, 2007 - 10:50 am: | |
What an interesting article, Jackob. I'm so thankful Martin Luther was clear about the Catholics' playing with words and was not deceived. To his credit, Walter Martin began to realize he'd been deceived before he died. He was not fully convinced, but he was beginning to see, and he reopened his investigation about the church. He died, though, before he could complete his new research. But your point is right: Walter Martin was deceived while Martin Luther was not. I believe one of the biggest differences is that Martin Luther had actually been a Catholic priest, and he KNEW what Catholics had always taught and believed. Walter Martin had never been Adventist, and he learned about Adventism by talking to a select group of more evangelical-sounding Adventists who explained what they wanted him to believe: the church did not use Ellen White as their basis for Scriptural understanding. Martin, from the outside, did not preceive the decetpion. It's true that even many who have been Adventist have trouble admitting the depth of the spiritual deception of Adventismóbut praise God that He is faithful; He does reveal truthóbut we also must be willing to see and know that truth. Thank you for sharing these quotes, Jackob. Colleen |
Dennis Registered user Username: Dennis
Post Number: 976 Registered: 4-2000
| Posted on Wednesday, February 07, 2007 - 5:31 pm: | |
Excellent thoughts, Colleen and Gabriel. Yes, Luther had the advantage of being a former insider while Martin was deceived big time. Dennis Fischer |
|