The BibleRunner: Missing the Point of... Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Edit Profile

Former Adventist Fellowship Forum » ARCHIVED DISCUSSIONS 9 » The BibleRunner: Missing the Point of the Ten Commandments « Previous Next »

  Thread Last Poster Posts Pages Last Post
  Start New Thread        

Author Message
Rossbondreturns
Registered user
Username: Rossbondreturns

Post Number: 353
Registered: 10-2009


Posted on Friday, March 16, 2012 - 12:12 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

This is not about Adventism or the Old Covenant/New Covenant...this is about what's happening in the U.K. and the rewriting of The Ten Commandments.

just 10 Missing the Point of the Ten Commandments

I am disgusted...but not surprised.

Ross
Katarain
Registered user
Username: Katarain

Post Number: 57
Registered: 1-2012
Posted on Saturday, March 17, 2012 - 1:09 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

So is this page discussing another page or publication entitled "just 10 The 10 Commandments for everyone? Because it seems to be arguing against a source, but I haven't seen the source, so it's very hard to follow.
Rossbondreturns
Registered user
Username: Rossbondreturns

Post Number: 354
Registered: 10-2009


Posted on Sunday, March 18, 2012 - 11:43 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Well the source isn't very well explained which is why I didn't include it. I didn't want to give J. John any undue publicity.

However I did make very clear which were j. John's just Ten.

Commandment.

or-

just Ten version of Commandment.

The easiest thing to do for as much clarity is to visit the links at the end of my article.

Or go here: the just Ten Simplified
Katarain
Registered user
Username: Katarain

Post Number: 58
Registered: 1-2012
Posted on Sunday, March 18, 2012 - 1:32 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Even an introduction at the beginning of the page explaining to the reader that you're responding to a recent publication entitled "just 10" would suffice. Otherwise, it's just confusing. I'm sorry to say that the formatting isn't actually clear, I was able to mostly figure it out, but I wasn't sure until I read your explanation here. If there had been an explanation of which was which, it would help your reader. I'm not trying to be critical, just trying to give you the perspective of this reader. Perhaps putting quotes around the actual title of the article your responding to in your title would help.
Katarain
Registered user
Username: Katarain

Post Number: 59
Registered: 1-2012
Posted on Sunday, March 18, 2012 - 1:33 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

That last link you gave helped a lot, because it introduced what item it was talking about and responding to.
Rossbondreturns
Registered user
Username: Rossbondreturns

Post Number: 355
Registered: 10-2009


Posted on Sunday, March 18, 2012 - 3:00 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I updated the article.

Add Your Message Here
Posting is currently disabled in this topic. Contact your discussion moderator for more information.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration